For anyone who reads this that isn't in my english class, this is a response to questions posed by my professor about Kenneth Branagh's version of Mary Shelley's novel, Frankenstein. I understand the need to compress a lot of information into a small time frame, and that no movie can ever be an exact interpretation of the novel it is based upon. Having said that, I don't believe Branagh did his best to keep in the spirit of the novel as well as he could have. He added some elements to the movie that I felt did not really jive with the novel at all. I am not saying that his movie wasn't any good. It was actually a very good movie, exept for the ending. I thought the ending was a big let-down.
One thing that really bothered me was how Victor and Elisabeth would call eachother "brother" and "sister" when they became intimate. That was weird. I never got any weird impression like that from the novel. I also feel like Branagh manipulated scenes from the novel to get more of a shock value out of them than if he'd just stayed true to what was written. I guess that's not necessarily a bad thing for a horror movie. I am talking specifically about the scene in which Victor's mother dies giving birth to William. She really dies of (I think) Scarlet Fever. But that wouldn't be bloody enough for us to appreciate, would it.
The other scene I am thinking about is Elisabeth's death. Instead of strangling her like he does in the novel, Branagh has the monster rip a hole in her chest with his bare hands like some ancient Aztec high priest, and pull out her heart. The monster version of Elisabeth, or "The Bride of Frankenstein," was not a bad aspect of the movie, but hardly in keeping with the novel. It did make the story interesting, but I feel it made Victor seem more insane than he really was in the novel. I'm not saying he wasn't insane in the novel, but he wasn't that kind of insane.
Another thing that bothered me was the ending. For Walton to offer the monster his hand and ask him to board the ship and sail home with them was an insult to Shelley's vision. Although the monster refuses his invitation, he is still given a glimps of humanity's ultimate good will before he burns himself alive. In the novel he is never presented with such an offer. He is confronted by Walton while he cries over the death of his creator, then he jumps from the ship to complete his own destruction. I guess I feel that if Kenneth Branagh had kept more to the storyline of the novel he would've probably been fine in calling it Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. But as the movie is now it should be called Kenneth Branagh's Frankenstein. I guess I can't be too hard on him though. He did stay with the theme of the novel in some ways. At least the main theme of the story is still the same- crazy scientist creates
Tuesday, April 8, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

3 comments:
The thing you have to remember with movies is that the more intense the scene, the better the movie sells. That is what filmmakers think about. Also, very few movies put humanity in a bad light, so the scene with Walton and the creature would be a complete anomaly if Walton didn't show sympathy.
I couldn't agree with you more about the ending. The whole point of the book was that humanity could not accept the monster, which is what created the being's rage and vengence in the first place. To remove this element in the movie, at the end no less doesn't make sense to me.
The movie was pretty gross by the way of incestual scenes. Personally I would be sure to never call a man I wanted to love my brother ever. Also the ending was very strange I am not sure whether this movie was attempting to portray there own version of the story or create there own interpretation of madness and creation. One thing I did like is how Victor appeared to be filthy and a mad scientist which I believe is protrayed in the book this is a similarity I seen and appreciated. The Elizabeth monster was horrible this ending was wacko.
Post a Comment